Stay informed with daily news and our newsletters!Learn more
|Home||Digital & Media Literacy||Research & Policy||Teacher Resources||Blog||About Us|
One way of looking at the process is to think of any group or movement as a pyramid. The base of the pyramid is made up of sympathizers who support the group and share its ideals but who are not actively involved in what it's doing. They are typically the largest part of the group but also the least committed.
This interactive online module takes students through a CyberTour of twelve mock websites to test their savvy surfing skills.
It includes a 20-question online quiz that provides additional food for thought about the Web issues that the brother and sister team Josie and Joseph Cool encounter.
This tutorial aims to teach students essential digital literacy skills through simulating their favourite online experiences. The tutorial is divided into four chapters, each of which focuses on a particular aspect of digital literacy: researching and authenticating online information, managing privacy and reputation, dealing with online relationships and using digital media in an ethical manner.
For all that the Internet can offer us, it sometimes offers a platform for promoting hatred and violence. In this section, we cover what online hate means, what Canadian law says about it, and how young people and adults can respond to it while keeping in mind Canada’s position on freedom of expression.
Most definitions of hate focus on the ways in which entire groups of people are viewed as the 'Other'. U.S.-based Tolerance.org says that "prejudices are formed by a complex psychological process that begins with attachment to a close circle of acquaintances, or an 'in-group', such as a family. Prejudice is often aimed at 'out-groups,'" groups that are not included in the 'in-group' on the basis of certain shared characteristics. 
When hatred is determined to have been an inciting factor in a crime, penalties are increased.  But the appropriateness of applying legislation meant for offline hatred to online hatred is debatable. The number of different laws which might be applied to online hate can lead to conflicting conclusions about the definition of hateful behaviour and freedom of expression; further, considerable debate exists over which types of speech should be subject to these laws at all.
Hate in a Free Speech Environment
Many argue that the best response to hate speech is not criminalization, but more speech. A classic example of this took place during the 1990s when Canadian Ken McVay, founder of the anti-hate Nizkor Project, spent over a decade attempting to engage hate activist and Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel in an online discussion.
The Boston Marathon tragedy has raised questions about the role the Internet plays in radicalizing youth and, more generally, how it may be used to perpetuate hatred. In Canada, similar questions are being asked about the radicalization of four London Ontario students in the wake of last January’s attack on an Algerian gas plant. Sadly, just as hate is a fact of life offline, it also exists in the digital world.
In this game, designed for ages 8-10, the CyberPigs play on their favourite website and encounter marketing ploys, spam and a close encounter with a not-too-friendly wolf.
The purpose of the game is to teach kids how to spot online marketing strategies, protect their personal information and avoid online predators.